Welcome to goTitans.com! Log in or sign up to be a part of the best Tennessee Titans fan site available.

Bulluck No Longer One Man Show

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by goTitans.com, Aug 5, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 3 users.
  1. Bulluckfan Camp Fodder

    Messages:
    352
    Moolah:
    $0
    Bulluck wasn't as good in 04, but it hurt him to have such crap around him. That's not why he missed tackles and such, but he was overextended in general. If he can return to dominance this season, with Thornton and Sirmon stepping up, we could have a very nice defense.
    #11
  2. Bobo Guest

    Messages:
    0
    Looked like he blitzed quite a bit last year. Enough to expect 10 sacks? I don't know, but probably not. But expecting those kinda #'s from a 4-3 olb is asking for a lot.
    • Tip Jar Donor

    Childress79 Loungefly ®

    George
    Messages:
    7,973
    Moolah:
    $632
    Maybe with the changes in the D this year we'll start to resemble Fisher's favoured 46 defence again with blitzes coming from every where. Bulluck says we're gonna get nasty again!
  3. The Mrs Crush on Casey Starbucks!

    Messages:
    2,551
    Moolah:
    $0
    Adam and Keith do have a great friendship and have put last season behind them. The entire defense is having fun. However, the field general and yapping mouth on the field is going to be David Thornton. He brings great energy and also fun to the field. I have a feeling this defense is going to return to it's glory days of '99. Back when opposing teams were getting punched in the mouth.

    And I'm predicting Keith gets 11 sacks this season.
  4. SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Verner
    Messages:
    16,087
    Moolah:
    $327
    I can hear Thorton now...


    "C'mon Peyton! Choke it baby! Choke on 2!!
    Choke like ya did in the divisionals!"


    That would be so funny if he taunted him the whole game...
    maybe even mentioned some kind of garbage only Colts players know about. Who knows what kind of dorky things choke master p has done behind closed doors. I'd love it if they miked the dude up (ain't gonna happen) and we heard him go "Romo" on him!!! hahaha ... Romo of course is a reference to this talented smart alek.

    [IMG]

    this is one of the finest smack talkers in the game imho.
  5. LazyManJackson Starter

    Messages:
    2,986
    Moolah:
    $0

    Dang, and I got an A in my Math GCSE's:ha:
  6. SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Verner
    Messages:
    16,087
    Moolah:
    $327
    no problem. ie. 32>53 ... simple. it's called the rule of pacman. pacman always eats the bigger number, yes? a-ha... always make the pacman eat the larger number and gobble gobble, it's all good...:yes: <-- oh snap bipolar is taking over!!! Someone must really like the yes smilie!!! The yes smilie kicks butt :yes: yes yes.. I have had a yellow nodding yes man in my signiture for some time now. I found it roaming f2fa message boards. The jetsinsider has a dazzing array of smilies, (no laughter, I thought that was strange) ... just the same, the use of the yes is very yes yes. YES? okay then:yes:
  7. The Mrs Crush on Casey Starbucks!

    Messages:
    2,551
    Moolah:
    $0
    I thought Pacman ate the smaller number, i.e. 32>53....snicker, snicker.......
  8. Puck Pro Bowler

    Messages:
    13,049
    Moolah:
    $103
    i agree

    it's possible for an olb to accomplish that, but there would need to be some serious breakdown with opposing offenses and/or there would need to be some scripts designed specifically with that intent

    he could get 10, but i think it'd have to come in a few2+ sack games
  9. SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Verner
    Messages:
    16,087
    Moolah:
    $327
    askbipolar.com

    no no no... it's all right here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inequality

    it's pointing to less and open mouth to the larger.:geek:

    ie

    53 > 32 = #53 is greater than #32 see :yes: very simple.

    32 < 53 = #32 is less than #53 :brow:

    no dice?

    bah!:evil:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page