The answer to me seems like a pretty obvious one, but I got into a pretty heated argument over this with a couple of friends yesterday... lasted at least 30 minutes. This is sort of random (not even really sure where the argument started from), but who do you guys think is better as of TODAY (heading into the 2010 NFL season)? Brett Favre or Aaron Rodgers? I'm all for Rodgers. I'd say he's a top 5 QB in this league. Both of my friends say Favre. I even went on to ask if you could choose a QB to have on the Titans... Brett Favre or Aaron Rodgers?... I still think the answer is pretty obvious (Rodgers), but they both prefer Favre. Favre is 40 years old, he's got a banged up ankle, and he has one more season at best left in him. Rodgers is 26 years old, healthy, in his prime, and has another 10-12 seasons left in him (assuming he can stay healthy). I just don't see how anyone could think Favre is currently a better QB than Rodgers. One of my friends even went on and extended the argument, saying that Brett Favre is a better QB because he led his team further into the playoffs... that's illogical. Hell, Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl and he's one of the worst QBs I've ever seen play. Kerry Collins made it further in the 2009 playoffs than Peyton Manning. Does that make him better? Definitely not. I said that Favre had it easier because he had AP to help out... my friend went on to argue that Ryan Grant did better than AP in weeks 11-17, implying that Aaron Rodgers had more help than Favre. My @ss! I'm just curious as to what everyone else thinks.