Biggest Positional Need?

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by xpmar9x, Jan 2, 2013.

Biggest Positional Need?

  1. DE

    1 vote(s)
    2.2%
  2. DT

    5 vote(s)
    11.1%
  3. OG/C

    30 vote(s)
    66.7%
  4. CB

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. S

    7 vote(s)
    15.6%
  6. ILB

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. WR/TE

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. QB

    2 vote(s)
    4.4%
  9. RB

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. OT

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. SoCalTitan867

    SoCalTitan867 Special Teams Standout

    700
    417
    79
    Has to be an og/c. It's been an issue for way too long. I really like the idea of moving back and getting an extra second. We could address og/c, SS and DT all in 2 rounds.
    #31
  2. Titan43

    Titan43 Pro Bowler

    3,843
    1,906
    519
    OG/C has to be the choice because that is technically 2 positions. LOL

    I picked OG/C becuase I do think that is our biggest need, but I don't think it has to be addressed rd 1 of the draft. I would 1st look to FA, then maybe rds 2-3 of the draft.

    Round 1, I am looking at DT (specifically star) ... its still early enough that no one's draft position is set, so its not like a pipe dream (at least not yet). Get an impact DT and it makes every one look better. A SS doesn't do that. SS is a big need, but it just fixes 1 position. DT can fix several. And I do like Marks/Casey/Martin, but they are penetration guys. They are pass rushers. They can't take on the double team. They aren't clogging up the middle of the line keeping OLs off our LBs. They aren't run stuffers and space eaters. That is what this D is missing.

    Get a DT like that, and the other DTs/DEs will get to the passer better, which will make the Safeties and CBs look better as well.

    Not saying we should ignore S, but if we have a chance to get a guy like star, then we HAVE to take it.
    #32
    • High Five High Five x 1
  3. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    13,790
    4,619
    609
    Looks like it's settled that OG/C is our #1 need.
    #33
  4. Ensconatus

    Ensconatus Losing faith...

    10,512
    3,219
    509
    I think it's easily our biggest need. Although unless we trade back, even with Warmack on the board, I don't see us picking OL at 10
    #34
  5. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    13,790
    4,619
    609
    Hopefully we can just sign Andy Levitre (and resigned Velasco) and get some D playmakers early instead. Then all we need is another starting G or C (could be recv'd in the 3rd-4th or FA).
    #35
    • High Five High Five x 1
  6. LANGSTER

    LANGSTER Starter

    2,075
    475
    399
    nfl coaching staff and nfl caliber S's
    #36
  7. ncaalover12

    ncaalover12 Starter

    1,299
    286
    199
    Don't worry we'll draft another LB like Te'o or something.
    #37
  8. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    13,790
    4,619
    609
    #38
    • High Five High Five x 1
  9. TorontoTitanFan

    TorontoTitanFan Pro Bowler

    5,820
    2,466
    559
    #39
    • High Five High Five x 1
  10. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    13,790
    4,619
    609
    I would be happy with all 3 of them as well.

    We really need to cut Michael Griffin, but I just can't see it happening.
    #40