Sorry... I meant to say a 3-4 OLB, but I still say he is too much of a tweener for a first rounder in our scheme. And a 4.47 is not "a 4.47". That's my point, most of these times are found in articles taken from local papers, who use the fastest time they can find, even if every other scout in attendance had a player clocked at a slower time. Again I like him, but I wouldn't take him in the first round... too many other players who would be a much better value, even with our low first rounder.