1. Week 13 Pick'em Winners: Doc and RavensShallBurn won spread hitting 11 of 15. TitanT won normal with 13 of 15. Week 14 Pick'em will be up by Wednesday evening.

Are the Seahawks on the verge of a dynasty?

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by JCBRAVE, Jan 24, 2014.

Do you think the Seahawks can win the next 2 or 3 Super Bowls and become a dynasty?

  1. Yes

    5 vote(s)
  2. No

    25 vote(s)
  3. I think they may win 2 or 3 but not in a row

    8 vote(s)
  1. Laserjock

    Laserjock South Endzone Rocks! Staff

    The days of any team keeping a vast core of very, very good players together long enough to establish a dynasty are behind us now. Pittsburgh...Dallas....those teams were dynasties because free agency and stupid money were not en vogue then.

    Now...guy has a good year or two and with 3 years left on his contract he is already talking about needing to get paid and crap.

    Prima donnas don't a dynasty make.

    JCBRAVE Wake up and die right Tip Jar Donor

  3. Two Kings

    Two Kings NJ Titan


    I don't necessarily agree with all that. The Pats did it recently. It CAN be done. I think it is rare though.
  4. Titans2004

    Titans2004 Starter

    In 2015 Avril, Thomas, and Sherman are FAs. Then in 2016 they have Wilson, Lynch, Okung, Wagner, Irvin, and Mebane. So a large core needs payment pretty soon.
  5. TitanJeff

    TitanJeff Kahuna Grande Staff

    They made an unlikely fourth down TD pass just to make it to the Super Bowl. A lot of things have to line up for a team to be in position to win a Super Bowl just ONCE. Players are a key cog in the machine but there's too much parity in the league for any team to win three in-a-row these days.
  6. 615nick

    615nick Starter

    This is why I say no. Thomas, sherman and wilson at least will command big money, if they keep these three guys it will cripple their cap. As good as the two dbs are I say they let one go.
  7. RavensShallBurn

    RavensShallBurn Ruck the Favens

    They'll do everything they can to hold onto the core players. I don't think they'll be able to retain Bennett this year. And I'd think they'll lose Avril next year. They have to focus on keeping Sherman, Thomas, Chancellor, Wilson, and Lynch. I could see them dumping Lynch whenever he's a free agent because I think Turbin and Michael will be solid backs for them. And they'll need to focus the money elsewhere.

    I wanted us to go after Bennett last year, but now that we are switching to a 3-4 (hybrid) I'm not sure how he fits or if he could play OLB. I can't remember if he ever did that with the Bucs or not...
  8. nickmsmith

    nickmsmith Most poverty RB core.

    The only steady piece to that puzzle on-roster was Brady. Literally every other piece has come and gone. Wilfork may be one of the only exceptions.. he's been there for a decade, but only one of their SB wins.

    They were far from a full-team dynasty. Tons of turnover. That's simply a case of a great QB. I'd call them a solid team for a decade and a half (almost) but a Dynasty, nah.. Just my opinion. When I think of Dynasty, I think of a mostly unchanging core of players that dominate. They had that from 2000-2004 or so, but after that, they were kept afloat by brady.
  9. RavensShallBurn

    RavensShallBurn Ruck the Favens

    I fully expect Wilson to win at least a couple more Super Bowls.

    For the time being they'll hold that team intact. As of right now I will pick them to repeat. Things change quickly though.
  10. Two Kings

    Two Kings NJ Titan


    I agree with you completely. They are referred to a dynasty but ESPN and NFL. Really good point about their turnover too, I completely forgot about that.

    But yea, I guess it can be done but just not in the traditional sense like you were describing.