Are the Seahawks on the verge of a dynasty?

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by JCBRAVE, Jan 24, 2014.

?

Do you think the Seahawks can win the next 2 or 3 Super Bowls and become a dynasty?

  1. Yes

    2 vote(s)
    6.7%
  2. No

    22 vote(s)
    73.3%
  3. I think they may win 2 or 3 but not in a row

    6 vote(s)
    20.0%
  1. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,503
    Interesting write up from Sports Illustrated about building a dynasty in the NFL.
    They dont mention the Ravens, but yea, them too.
    http://nfl.si.com/2014/01/23/seattle-seahawks-super-bowl-xlviii/
    #1
  2. Scarecrow

    Scarecrow CEO of PPO

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    20,606
    Don't you think this is just a tad bit premature for a team that has never won a Super Bowl?
    #2
    • High Five High Five x 11
  3. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,503
    I was getting ready to say that,

    Seattle is 38-26 since 2010, not very dynasty-like at all, but SI brought it up
    #3
  4. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    25,668
    They have a lot of young players to retain. Russell Wilson and Richard Sherman are playing for pennies right now. Earl Thomas is still under his rookie deal.

    Those guys are fixtures, so they have to be paid. Should be interesting to see who else on the team doesn't get their money because those three definitely deserve it.
    #4
    • High Five High Five x 5
  5. The Hammer

    The Hammer Straight Ridah

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    Messages:
    15,750
    I should have known who started this thread lol
    #5
    • High Five High Five x 1
  6. nickmsmith

    nickmsmith has the most poverty RB corp.

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Messages:
    9,571
    yeah, all they're missing is like 4 Super Bowl wins in the next decade!

    That puts them in the same Dynasty class as the Cardinals, Browns, Titans, Lions, Vikings, Jaguars, Buccaneers, Raiders!
    #6
    • High Five High Five x 4
  7. Scarecrow

    Scarecrow CEO of PPO

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    20,606
    So far they are no more of a dynasty than the Eagles.
    #7
    • High Five High Five x 1
  8. The Hammer

    The Hammer Straight Ridah

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    Messages:
    15,750
    Raider had a bit of a dynasty in the late 70s -- early 80s. Vikings at least lost 4 Super Bowls which puts them ahead of the Seahawks at this point.

    I remember when the Bucs won their Super Bowl. Players and penis sucking media were calling them a dynasty in the making. Talking about how many Super Bowls they would probably win with "Coaching genius" Chucky Gruden leading them on. They also complained about not being considered one of the greatest defenses of all time. The year before the Ravens won the Super Bowl and many argued they had the greatest defense of all time. Which offended Bucs players who felt their defense was better. Since the Ravens only won one Super Bowl and the Bucs were going on to win several.

    The Bucs have pretty much sucked ever since. The next year they did not even make the playoffs. Man I hated that team. Bunch of dinks with an overrated coach.
    #8
  9. GOFIGURETITANS

    GOFIGURETITANS Don't Do Stupid Sh't !

    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,024
    Case in point..
    image.jpg


    Definitely NOT a dynasty
    #9
    • High Five High Five x 1
  10. Scarecrow

    Scarecrow CEO of PPO

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    20,606
    This is a terrible poll BTW, of course they CAN. So by default everyone should be voting 'yes'.
    #10
    • High Five High Five x 1