Alice in Chains vs U2

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by CRUDS, Apr 16, 2010.

Alice in Chains vs U2

Poll closed Apr 18, 2010.
  1. Alice in Chains

    11 vote(s)
    50.0%
  2. U2

    11 vote(s)
    50.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CRUDS

    CRUDS Creepin' it Real Tip Jar Donor

    17,550
    5,237
    759
    Winner moves on
    #1
  2. Childress79

    Childress79 Loungefly ® Tip Jar Donor

    8,325
    1,692
    529
    U2 suck since Pop
    #2
  3. Tuckfro42

    Tuckfro42 Frozen Donkey Wheel

    1,964
    556
    239
    Love AIC, but the longevity and consistency of U2 crushes the hard-harmonies of Alice in Chains.
    #3
  4. joelmunroe

    joelmunroe Camp Fodder

    233
    10
    0
    good battle so far compared to the other landslide, had to go with aic
    #4
  5. CRUDS

    CRUDS Creepin' it Real Tip Jar Donor

    17,550
    5,237
    759
    I don't even know who U2 is after about 1990.. AIC because Dirt was a great record..
    #5
  6. Alex1939

    Alex1939 Space Invaders Champion Tip Jar Donor

    17,494
    6,741
    789
    and Jar of Flies.


    This looks like a first round travesty
    #6
  7. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    13,051
    451
    539
    New Years - Bloody Sunday was the last time I listened to U2
    #7
  8. SEC 330 BIPOLAR

    SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    16,087
    1,962
    699
    man in the box makes me sad. :hmm:
    #8
  9. avvie

    avvie Ke ali'i o na okole Tip Jar Donor

    9,126
    1,147
    729
    This is a toughie for me, as I believe there are actually 2 separate bands called U2: the one that recorded Boy, October and War, and the other band that's a commercial dreckfest fronted by an arrogant and self-important dweeb who takes really bad investment advice. Since there's no distinction made in the poll, AIC wins my vote by default.
    #9
    • High Five High Five x 1
  10. joelmunroe

    joelmunroe Camp Fodder

    233
    10
    0
    This is shaping up to be a first round upsetttt
    #10
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.