AFC South Rankings: QB

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by TitanJeff, May 30, 2008.

?

AFC South Rankings: QB

  1. Colts: P. Manning

    82.8%
  2. Jaguars: D. Garrard

    1.7%
  3. Texans: M. Schaub

    5.2%
  4. Titans: V. Young

    10.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    13,078
    Last year at this time the Jags probaly would've won. Now I might vote for the Titans.
    #31
  2. Overalls

    Overalls Starter

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,501
    I voted Manning but voting for Schaub isn't any more of a homer pick than picking VY.
    #32
  3. RollTide

    RollTide All-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    20,352
    `I voted for schaub. Why not this is a meaningless exercise anyway. Everyone knows who is far and away the best player at that position so lets move on to another.
    #33
  4. RollTide

    RollTide All-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    20,352
    Fyi rhodes is now a colt again. Cost them a mere $650K to have him.
    #34
  5. titanbuoy

    titanbuoy medium rare ®

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,354

    :ha: What a shock! Rolltide being a contrarian.

    Voting the opposite of popular opinion just for the sake of being contrary is every bit as lame as voting the same as the group just to feel you belong. Perhaps it's even more lame because generally it's done under the ruse of being clever (when in reality it's about as clever as a three year old who first discovers the joy of being argumentative).
    #35
  6. Overalls

    Overalls Starter

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,501
    You're the only one so far to go with the blind homer pick and vote for Vince. Being a blind homer seems pretty lame too.
    #36
  7. titanbuoy

    titanbuoy medium rare ®

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,354
    Totally valid. But I was upfront with my reasoning for the pick and certainly wasn't trying to elicit any specific reaction. I get the sense that Rolltide specifically designs many of his posts based on their effect (rather than any real belief in their content). It's like we're all an experiment in behaviour and he's offering up negative stimulus to see what type of reaction it elicits. It's condescending to his fellow members and it's honestly just tiresome.

    That might seem like splitting hairs, but to me the difference is pretty vast (but I may be a little biased :)) )
    #37
  8. BudAdams

    BudAdams SayHelloToMyLittleFriends

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,821
    my vote for schaub was purely based on sarcasm
    #38
  9. SEC 330 BIPOLAR

    SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,087
    oh snap 'buoy! :ha:
    #39
  10. RollTide

    RollTide All-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    20,352
    Moronic based on both fact and theory. I said very plainly that this was a no contest vote. Manning a sure future HOF QB is without a doubt the best. And guess what he has got 90% of the vote. So how in the flying you bleep am i a contrarian? I agree with the 90% who voted for manning!

    My vote for scab was merely a joke. Hell our owner even voted for him for purposes of sarcasm. Duh!
    #40
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.