Welcome to goTitans.com! Log in or sign up to be a part of the best Tennessee Titans fan site available.

AFC South Rankings: QB

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by TitanJeff, May 30, 2008.

?

AFC South Rankings: QB

Colts: P. Manning 48 vote(s) 82.8%
Jaguars: D. Garrard 1 vote(s) 1.7%
Texans: M. Schaub 3 vote(s) 5.2%
Titans: V. Young 6 vote(s) 10.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 5 users.
  1. The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    Brown
    Messages:
    11,123
    Moolah:
    $10,764
    Last year at this time the Jags probaly would've won. Now I might vote for the Titans.
    #31
  2. Overalls Starter

    Messages:
    1,500
    Moolah:
    $5
    I voted Manning but voting for Schaub isn't any more of a homer pick than picking VY.
  3. RollTide Pro Bowler

    Bishop
    Messages:
    18,203
    Moolah:
    $10,201
    `I voted for schaub. Why not this is a meaningless exercise anyway. Everyone knows who is far and away the best player at that position so lets move on to another.
  4. RollTide Pro Bowler

    Bishop
    Messages:
    18,203
    Moolah:
    $10,201
    Fyi rhodes is now a colt again. Cost them a mere $650K to have him.
  5. titanbuoy medium rare ®

    Brown
    Messages:
    4,077
    Moolah:
    $1,053

    :ha: What a shock! Rolltide being a contrarian.

    Voting the opposite of popular opinion just for the sake of being contrary is every bit as lame as voting the same as the group just to feel you belong. Perhaps it's even more lame because generally it's done under the ruse of being clever (when in reality it's about as clever as a three year old who first discovers the joy of being argumentative).
  6. Overalls Starter

    Messages:
    1,500
    Moolah:
    $5
    You're the only one so far to go with the blind homer pick and vote for Vince. Being a blind homer seems pretty lame too.
  7. titanbuoy medium rare ®

    Brown
    Messages:
    4,077
    Moolah:
    $1,053
    Totally valid. But I was upfront with my reasoning for the pick and certainly wasn't trying to elicit any specific reaction. I get the sense that Rolltide specifically designs many of his posts based on their effect (rather than any real belief in their content). It's like we're all an experiment in behaviour and he's offering up negative stimulus to see what type of reaction it elicits. It's condescending to his fellow members and it's honestly just tiresome.

    That might seem like splitting hairs, but to me the difference is pretty vast (but I may be a little biased :)) )
  8. BudAdams SayHelloToMyLittleFriends

    Locker
    Messages:
    1,818
    Moolah:
    $36
    my vote for schaub was purely based on sarcasm
  9. SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Verner
    Messages:
    16,092
    Moolah:
    $307
    oh snap 'buoy! :ha:
  10. RollTide Pro Bowler

    Bishop
    Messages:
    18,203
    Moolah:
    $10,201
    Moronic based on both fact and theory. I said very plainly that this was a no contest vote. Manning a sure future HOF QB is without a doubt the best. And guess what he has got 90% of the vote. So how in the flying you bleep am i a contrarian? I agree with the 90% who voted for manning!

    My vote for scab was merely a joke. Hell our owner even voted for him for purposes of sarcasm. Duh!
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page