A trade with Washington?

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by Dangermode, Feb 16, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RyansTitans

    RyansTitans Guest

    erm.. ok?

    You dont want Ginn? Well we aint gettin Calvin or Jarret so why not Ginn? Im tellin ya he is gonna be a gem...
    #11
  2. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    46,841
    You don't know who we are getting, who will fall or be a reach pick.
    #12
  3. RyansTitans

    RyansTitans Guest

    I never said I knew who we were getting.. Who I want is Ginn JR.. Ive seen thousands of mock drafts and it seems like other people share the same opionion as me. Ginn would be perfect for Young. This trade talk with Washington IMO would be retarded. They would want our 1 , 2 and maybe even 3 for that..
    #13
  4. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    46,841
    You said who we are not getting.
    #14
  5. RyansTitans

    RyansTitans Guest

    Becuase theres just no way that Jarrett and Johnson fall to 19. Unless we trade up...
    #15
  6. RyansTitans

    RyansTitans Guest

    Ok im just going to ask you.. Ive been really iritated with you every time I say something about Ginn you just say no... whats your beef with him? What can you possibly see in him that makes you say no?
    #16
  7. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    46,841
    I just think he will be another Woolfolk.
    #17
  8. RyansTitans

    RyansTitans Guest

    So your not even willing to give him a chance? What if he runs a 4.3 40? Idk I like him. Not everyone has the same opionion. Guess were just gonna have to wait and see
    #18
  9. nouveaux

    nouveaux Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    103
    I don't like WR's who can't catch. Therefore, I don't like Ginn. Jarrett could easily fall to us at 19, IMO.
    #19
  10. Soxcat

    Soxcat Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    8,485
    First it would take a 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th based on trade value charts so yes the price would be steep.

    If we want a WR we might be better off to stay where we are or even trade back a few spots depending on who they target. I could see them trading up to get one of the top DEs or DTs. Personally I don't think a trade up that gives up a bunch of picks would neccesarily be retarded if it means getting a guy we wnat and are confident can come in and produce right away. I'd rather have one stud than 4 maybes.

    I haven't made my mind up on Ginn yet. He certainly has the most big play ability of just about anyone in this draft. If he truly runs a 4.3 at the combine (or personal workouts) and does well in WR drills where teams feel fairly confident in his route running and hands he could easily be gone before we pick at 19. IMO if he drops to us at 19 it is because other teams see flaws.
    #20
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.