A post not about Pacman. Drew v. Wade

Bennett vs Wade, or Roe v. Wade? Since this has nothing to do with abortion, (...the removing/removal of something no longer wanted, i.e., mistake), or does it? Or is it that we think we can't afford to keep both? Or is it that we are deep at the position, but not quality depth?
Wade impresses me more than Drew, but I would like to keep both if we can have Drew cheap.

I'd keep Bobby over Drew. Both would be better.

:what:

I'm thinking that neither are really that important (as long as the Titans sign suitable replacements), but Wade's skill set is intriguing and I can't imagine he'd be all that pricey to re-sign.

PS: I'd rather have Wade at his price than the apt to be pricey Donte Stallworth. That guy never stays healthy (I think he just pulled his hamstring as I typed this). Given the Tacks history on free agent wideouts I just can't fathom signing the injury prone Stallworth.

I would like to keep both, but I would not overpay for Drew in any case. Wade sort of reminds me of D. Mason early in his career. He may be just a little faster but probably not quite as quick or nimble. Drew is a great number 3, a good number 2 and as we have witnessed a terrible number 1. It might be hard to keep both or either however because so many team have "monopoly" $$$ to play with this year.

adios teflon

:lol2:

Bennett's not a number one, and that's what he'd expect to be if we brought him back. I said keep Wade let Bennett go

Drew has proven to me that if we need him to make the game winning play, he won't. If I have to pick (and I do) I'd take Wade. By the way, Brandon Jones is going to explode this year. Book it!