3-4 Defense

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by citizenthom, Jan 6, 2013.

  1. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    44,604
    In my experience at MLB, things got a good bit easier when there were 4 of us instead of 3. It really got all our talented players on the field that year and we were a better team for it.

    Thats what the Titans need to do, our 7th best player is a LB not a linemen.
    #41
  2. Ensconatus

    Ensconatus Losing faith...

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    9,806
    Again I think some of this requires an entire philosophy change and correct fits to succeed.
    #42
  3. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    44,604
    I could so easily make the 3-4 work for us, putting guys in here and there is the easy part, it's them adjusting to the game from a new viewpoint thats hard.

    We sucked in 2012 using a 4-3, we need to be a 3-4 and everyone knows it.
    #43
  4. Ensconatus

    Ensconatus Losing faith...

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    9,806
    I wouldn't be against the 34. I'm just not sure it's the thing that will happen during munches prove it year... I think we have the proper LBs on the outside for it. I think Martin and Casey/Morgan would be decent at 5 techs... NT and another ILB is a big need.

    This secondary still sucks regardless tho.
    #44
  5. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    44,604
    2 out of the 4 suck, and a good way to alleviate some of the pressure off those guys would be to have a 3-4 front. More LB's means less whiffs by our safeties.
    #45
  6. Obie09

    Obie09 Starter

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,991
    Does anyone think we'll actually do the right thing and release Griffin after the SB? He even mentioned he doesn't know if he'll be here next year in his last interview so I can only hope.
    #46
  7. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    44,604
    We should, but I doubt we will. He's serviceable, and if he's got talent around him, he can be good.

    Plus there's more SS's for us to look out for, so again, he lucks out because of a lack of other options.
    #47
  8. Psychop1

    Psychop1 Big Tee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,449
    What I'm curious about, other than an obscure comparison to Sapp because he was also a DT and in the twilight years of his career, what says Martin can't play this type of defense? Prototypical size and effort don't seem to be an issue.

    I remember when people said Dumervil would fail at 3-4 OLB citing the responsibilities of 3-4 OLB vs. the responsibilities of a 4-3 DE. Career high for Dumervil... It's not the same as a 4-3 DT transitioning to 3-4 DE; I'm just saying you can't really judge how one player will transition parallel to how another transitioned. And I'm not saying Martin would definitely become a star at 3-4 DE, but from I have seen out of him, we could do much worse.

    The mental aspect might hold him back. I don't think it would.
    #48
  9. Ensconatus

    Ensconatus Losing faith...

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    9,806
    For those wanting a 34 defense...Rob Ryan got fired in Dallas.
    #49
    • High Five High Five x 1
  10. RollTide

    RollTide All-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    20,245

    The 4-3 is not why we sucked. We also had depth problems at linebacker with McCarthey out many games and Spoon out or playing at less than 100%.

    The 3-4 doesn't fix any of our problems. How does it?
    #50