Paul Kuharsky's projected 53

TBH the line never gave him a chance, he could be ok if the line doesn't fall on his lap

 

Palmer cant be as bad as Zach Brown so solid chance it's his job to lose

What other ILB is there after Palmer??

 

I'd take Sankey as RB3 and cut the rest, although I've sadly come to terms with DMC being here another season. Andrews is nothing special, and we already have 2 powerbacks. I was looking forward to Cobb, but he was meh. Sankey is the change of pace guy, and they spent a 2nd on the guy.

 

I

I agree they will and should likely give Sankey the chance because we do have 2 power backs, but just because they spent a 2nd on him means zilch to me...They also spent a second on Hunter.........exactly. The problem with Sankey, is that he SHOULD be the shifty, receiving type back...but he showed anything but that. I guess we can all blame the line, but he didn't show me a lot of pep in his step, nor did anyone else. I just hope his attitude and play changes this year, because it would be awesome to have 3 quality backs for once!

 

Sean spence

 

Well Paul K knows the team well. And knows what he is talking about.

 

Curtis grant.

 

How can a back move the chains when averaging 2.8 yards per carry? He would need 4 carries! Sankey as poor as he was averaged 4.1 and McCluster 4.5.

 

Previous to that, I was discussing pre season and before injury...I am not by any means saying Cobb is great, but he was injured...and early on he looked as good as Sankey if not better at times. I just don't see how anyone can say Sankey looked good...He didn't. Ever! He wasn't shifty, fast, or breaking tackles. Knock Cobb all you want, but he's a 5th round pick, not the 1st back taken in the draft like Sankey.

 

haha @ people surprised by thinking Sankey sticks.

Kuharsky isn't being an overdramatic fan.

He's being realistic.