Ted Sundquist

which is what makes the article worthless, tell us something we dont already know...

 

Even if we already assumed every single detail Sundquist wrote, him confirming those details would still have value. He was actually there.

And we certainly didn't know everything. We didn't know that ownership is claiming to be scared about in-fighting among coaches and that's how they justified the Mularkey decision to GM candidates.

Sundquist strongly hinted that the Titans are trying to copy another team's specific model (he doesn't name the team) and mentioned he advised against that. That's notable.

Like I said, it's definitely not anything groundbreaking, but it's perhaps the best insight into ownership we're likely to get this year. It's certainly not worthless.

 

I can see how one could appreciate confirmation of something they only to that point thought was true, but youre really no better off for him sharing his experience.

The juice is not worth the squeeze.

 

Sundquist sounds like an orange flavored soft drink.

 

Tennessee just didn't want another Sundquist.

 

I'm totally with Toronto on this one. I wish more people would share their sour grapes. Who care's, the more negative press the better chance of change. Obviously the NFL thinks Titans ownership has major issues right now. But the good ole Titans fans have to eat another s#$! sandwich and pretend it's filet mignon.

If this were NY or Boston nobody on the board would give ownership benefit of the doubt on anything at this point....

 

A sip of Sundquist leaves a bitter taste in your mouth.

 

Yea **** the Adams family.