Trading out of #1. What will it take?

Our pick has a value of 3,000 points. The 4th pick (1800)+ 34th pick (560)+ 67th pick (255)+ 2017 1st (?)= 2615 with potential should Dallas suck again in 2017.

Id do that deal but why would Dallas?

Was it just a fan making this prediction?

 

It was titansized.com.

 

People need to get over the Redskins/Rams trade.

That won't happen anytime in the foreseeable future.

 

I've seen a couple insights where they are trying right or left hand Bosa and Ramsey

 

I don't think the Cowboy will be willing to give up all that talent through multiple picks for any QB in this draft. Goffs good, but is trading all those picks worth it when you could get Connor Cook say rd 2? Develop under Romo 2-3 years, etc.

Regadless, with Jerry Jones.. who knows. If it did happen, what a dream scenario. Pickup Ramsey, have 4 early 2nd & 3rd rounders to go OL, WR, RB, ILB hopefully.

 

Browns saying they want to trade back, but of course thats what you say at this point if youre them

 

Doesn't sound like they are thinking QB in 1

Aikman: Manziel or RGIII will be Cowboys backup QB - NFL.com

Cowboys' Jerry Jones: We don't have to draft QB in 2016 - NFL.com

I'm afraid the Cowboys are looking at Ramsey at 4, before the Jags.

 

I think you can pretty much throw that point chart in the toilet. Ain't no team in the league paying Beverly Hills prices for South Compton property. There is no QB or player that multiple teams are willing to mortgage their future for. The price will have to match it's PRACTICAL value, and not it's supposed value.

We'd be lucky to get a 2nd Rd pick to swap with Dallas, and they are going to be more inclined to bring RGIII or Manziel back to Texas territory. That leaves only the Eagles and Rams. They will just sit tight and let Paxton Lynch or Wentz fall to them.

 

Sell the pick and sell it cheap. Screw draft charts or past trades. Get whatever we can and remain in the top 5 (guaranteeing tunsil, bosa, Hargreaves, or Ramsey) . Id be happy with any of these, and any extra picks are just gravy. If we drafted any of them at #1, we'd all be happy (maybe shocked if Hargreaves but we'd come around) . So just accept whoever will give us the most picks. If all it ends up being is swap 1sts and a 2nd then so be it. We should have an open auction for the pick. Let them outright compete for it