Would you trade a win for Locker's health?

Who voted No? What in the hell is wrong with you? Why is this even a poll?

 

I voted no by accident because the wording is very odd. Now I'm thinking, wait I'm a grown man voting my opinion on this silly question. Errbody who saw NewHorizons on the jumbotron at the game today say whoop woooooop!

 

What a stupid thread. Locker's health had nothing to do with this win. It's not like he was injured diving over the pile for the game-winning touchdown.

 

I get that you have an uncanny ability to make stupid threads.

*Tite* "Poll."

Very insightful.

 

Pretty interesting to see the different ways people interpreted the question. I really hope that is the primary reason "No" has 13 votes.

 

What is there to get? I wouldn't trade a healthy, ascending QB for a win.

Did his injury have anything to do with winning or losing the game? No. Do we know the severity of the injury? No. This thread is irrelevant, unnecessary and the fact that half of the people don't understand the question being asked proves that it's a stupid thread because the first post is a single word not explaining a damn thing.

 

first thing I said after I heard of the injury was I would rather lose and still have jake as qb than win and have him hurt


I get what you mean jcbrave

 

You have to look at the future when answering that question. The question is, who can take us further? Fitz or Locker? At this point I think Locker can. However, I think Fitz can do some good things. We could be a lot worse at Qb if we didn't have Fitz...